Question 2(a) · 20 marks · 336 words written
Opening
The functionalist tradition was started by Emile Durkheim who is credited for bringing positivist methodology to the realms of social science.
Functionalist school of thought believes that all social structures, institutions & processes serve a function. This was an empathetic reaction to the emergence of modernity & the chaos in society thereof. The chaos was explained by Durkheim to help perform a function - of social change.
The society is seen as a system that undergoes social change or conforms & shows continuity based on the impact of events on the 'conscience collective' of the society.
This school was further propagated by Parsons who gave his structural-functionalist theory. It propounds that all elements in a structure have some function & roles to perform. These roles are attributed by the system itself & it is this role fulfilment that helps the system continue without change. If the roles are not fulfilled & objected to, new roles are assigned & hence a new equilibrium is established.
These functional theories help us explain why the society -
Body · points and prose
Continues: Like the caste system in India still flourishes as it serves a function of political mobilisation.
Change: The empowerment of women after subsequent feminist movements as the women refused to conform to their patriarchal roles.
Although functionalist school explains a lot of phenomenons successfully, it is flawed in some sense:-
It stresses that all power lies with the system - that is all change is brought by the system - ignoring the role of individuals like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela, Rosa Parks, etc.
It is status-quoist & justifies social evils for being functional to society. Eg) Dowry is seen as economically functional but bad for society.
It formulates grand theories that are irrelevant temporally & spatially.
Close · a summary
Therefore, it is flawed in some sense & post-modern scholars reject it & only believe in meta narratives but functional school is credited for bringing order to a chaotic European society. & therefore still holds relevance in times of distress.