Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 164 words written
Opening · a definition
Srinivas defines Sanskritization as the process of adoption of rituals, food, way of life by lower castes, for mobility to higher positions, of twice born caste.
Body · points
Positional change, not structural change
Movement in secular hierarchy - due to increased access to education, employment, political opportunities.
Ritual hierarchy persists and is unaffected by secular mobility, according to Louis Dumont.
Limited to intermediary castes - the most backward and untouchables do not get access to Sanskritization due to forced exclusion.
Caste domination continues - Veena Das studies the highest position and respect awarded to Brahmins, sanyasis.
Caste system is not abolished, and thus there is no structural change.
Close · a summary
However, Srinivas, Beteille etc. argue how Sanskritization lowers the importance of secular hierarchy. McKim Marriott explains how political and economic interests take precedence and the 'fixed ritual hierarchy' doesn't reflect 'lived reality'.
Therefore, we can conclude that Sanskritization as a source of orthogenetic change is slowly causing transformation in caste structure in India.