Question 1 · 10 marks · 45 words written
The third battle of Panipat did not decide who would rule India but rather who would not. Discuss.
Opening · a restatement
The Third Battle of Panipat was fought between Marathas and the British empire, and played a major role in deciding the future of India.
Body · points and prose
* Did not decide who would rule India
* Even after victory, the British were not the clear rulers of India.
* other European powers as the Dutch and French remained strong contenders.
* Only after Battle of Bidara (1759) and Battle of Wandiwash (1760) were Dutch and French defeated respectively.
* Thus the winner of the 3rd battle of Panipat was not poised to be the sole remaining power in India.
- Decided who would not rule India
- The Marathas faced a crushing defeat and could never recover.
- No other major Indian power remained strong.
- Europeans were much stronger.
- Thus, it was clear that no Indian power would rule India.
- There was no scope of any alliance/confederacy among Indian states.
- Only major powers were British, French, Dutch
Close · a summary
Thus, the 3rd battle of Panipat ensured that no Indian power would rule India, but the ruler was not yet evident.