AIR 131 · CSE 2021 · Sociology I · 50 pages

Atulesh Jha: Sociology I answer copy

7 answers by Atulesh Jha, as written in the test. Each question opens a page with how other toppers answered it.

The questions

  1. Q7(b)Digital Education:

The answers

Question 1(a) · 321 words written

Comparative Method in sociology: Importance and limitations. 1(b) Positivism and its contestations: How these enriched sociology?

Opening · a definition

1(a) Comparative Method in sociology is used to analyse two separate data-sets and evaluate hypothesis on the outcomes. Comparative methods can be:-

Body · points

  1. Historical eg. Marx study of slave, feudal and capitalist societies.
  2. Longitudinal eg. Giddens study of marriage and divorce over time in Britain.
  3. Cross-cultural eg. Webers study of rise of capitalism in various religions.

Importance of comparative method:- → Helps to understand sociological theories in the context of history and time. → Social change theories are evaluated based on comparative understanding. → Helps to provide ready-made data sets for quantitative analysis eg. Durkheim's suicide study & reference points eg. Ideal type of Weber.

However, comparative methods are also criticized on following grounds: → Phenomenologists say that such studies ignore individual motivation for action. → Value-biasness creeps in as in case of Webers study of Protestant Ethics.

It cant however, be ignored that social anthropological researches own a lot to comparative methods for their development.

1(b) Positivism refers to the sociological method for research which espouses fact-value dichotomy; subject-object methodological dualism; objectivity; causal explanation; quantitative data; generalisation; verification and reductional analysis.

Contestations against it are: → Phenomenologists like Peter Berger, state that data is misnomer to understand social reality. → Post modernists like Foucault, state that causal explanations are misplaced and ignored individualism. → Neo-marxist and Feminists like Ann Oakley state it to be status-quoist; pro-establishment and ignores conflict. → Anti-positivists like Alvin W Gouldner say that value-neutrality is intellectual dishonesty. → Karl Popper states Falsification is ultimate test. → Thomas Kuhn criticises it as being ignorant of paradigmatic shift.

How these enriched sociology? → Rise epistemological anarchism in critical theory by Paul Feyerabend. → Qualitative research opens new paradigm in critical and feminist reseach. → Methodological Pluralism e.g. Triangulation as suggested by post-modernists.

Close

Positivism played an important role when it freed sociology from clutches of church and tried to establish it as a rational study of science.