Question 1(a) · 10 marks · 204 words written
Comment on the following in about 150 words each: 10x5=50 (a) Debates on Aryan Invasion
Opening
Aryan invasion debate was first given by max muller. As per him at around 1500 B.C. Aryan people from central Asia came to Indus valley and destroyed it and imposed their own culture.
Body · points
Argument in support
R.E.M Wheeler in his work "massacre of mohenjodaro" mention the skeleton of child and woman which he discovered from Cemetery-H.
Linguistics - Find similarity between greek and european language with Sanskrit Texting (Rigveda)
Indologist - through Rig vedic study mention Aryan invasion.
Argument Against :-
(i) Prof B.B. Lal study - renowned Indian Archceologist Brij Bhusan Lal studied IVC site and say:- (i) There was no Aryan invasion and it is myth. (ii) People of Harappa migrated to East and south due to drying up of Ghaghar river.
(2) Prof Vasant Shinde study of Rakhigarhi DNA skeleton - from Deccan college. He studied 4500 year old DNA skeleton of Rakhigarhi woman and his finding include:- (a) There is no evidence of mass scale migration or invasion (b) Aryan were indigenous to India. (c) People of South Asia share Harappan gene at wide scale. (d) Agriculture was indigenous to South Asia.
Close · a summary
Thus Aryan Invasion Debate is very complicated but provide wide information about India Proto history.