Aayushi BansalAIR 7 · CSE 2024 · 195 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
G.H. Mead was a doyen of symbolic interactionism, meeting point of sociology and Psychology.
Body · points and prose
To Mead, self is evolved in a societal context via play stage and game stage. This evolution takes place in form 'I' and 'me' part of self.
Distinction between the two :-
| 'I' | 'me' |
|---|---|
| dynamic, creative, unpredictable part of self | Predictable and uniform, with a static response |
| Brings novelty by discarding societal norms | Conforms to expectations of 'generalized others' |
| 'I' | 'me' |
|---|---|
| We know about 'I' after it has acted | 'me' is much more conscious & deliberate |
| Leaders, rebels, etc. have higher proportion of 'I' | General public, the so called 'followers' have higher proportion of 'me' |
Both 'I' and 'me' together interact with mind to play role in a social situation.
'I' facilitates innovation and continuous evolution of society. Eg → Raja Ram Mohan Roy didn't conform to societal idea of 'sati'. On the other hand, 'me' facilitates social continuity.
Close · a summary
Mead brought a paradygm shift with his 'micro' approach to sociology in Chicago school.