Sociology I · 20 marks

Micro sociological understanding of self and society ought to be different from macro sociological understanding of social systems - How?

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2022–2023

Syllabus: Sociology - The Discipline: (a) Modernity and social changes in Europe and emergence of Sociology. (b) Scope of the subject and comparison with other social sciences. (c) Sociology and common sense.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 370 words · 33% drew a diagram.

Opening

  • No separate opening3 of 3

Body

  • Points and prose2 of 3
  • Points1 of 3

Close

  • A summary3 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Pooja MalaniAIR 306 · CSE 2023 · 374 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening

Micro and Macro are two classical approaches for sociological understanding evolved through time.

Self and society refer to individual and sum total of all individuals respectively.

Body · points and prose

Sociological Understanding of self

According to macro perspective, self-development is possible due to sui-generis development of society.

However, it differs from micro perspective on self which takes into account individual's role also in terms of meanings & motives.

Micro v/s Macro on self

BasisMacro approachMicro approach
① IdeaIndividual's self is secondary to society. [Durkheim]Social system is primary but 'self' makes working of system possible - [Mead]
② MethodologyPositivism ⇒ Individuals react to an external stimuli in predefined manner. ⇒ Social facts can be observedPhenomenologists (Non Positivism) argue members are constantly constructing the external world. ⇒ Ways of constructing to be studied.
BasisMacro ApproachMicro Approach
③ Process of developmentMacro sociologists argued that people pursue cultural directives of society and 'self' is developed.Symbolic Interactionist like Mead said 'self' develops through constant interaction process - game and play stage

Micro v/s Macro on Society

BasisMacro ApproachMicro Approach
(1) Idea of societysociety is sui generis and constrains individuals' behaviourself and society are twin born.
(2) MethodologyPositivism ⇒ Objective measurement of social facts. ⇒ No place for inner world.Non Positivism ⇒ Subjective understanding of objective reality.

| (3) Perception regarding society | Social actors are passive. Society defines social structure which ensures social order. Thus constraining individual | Meanings and motives need to be measured. [Alfred Schutz] said that social order is an illusion created by members |

Bridge between these two approaches is co-created by Parsons' theory of action systems symbolising synthesis between two.

Close · a summary

That is, social actions by individuals form social system and actions are sometimes shaped by society's values.

Hence, it can be said that both approaches along with their synthesis help in widening the scope of sociology.

More on G. H. Mead

The self and identity: I and me, the generalised other, symbolic interactionism.

All Sociology I questions on G. H. Mead