Ishan BhatnagarAIR 5 · CSE 2025 · 275 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
The increasing presence of civil servants on social media calls into question the values of anonymity, austerity and ability, the three most salient values of the services.
Body · points
(a) Ethical Issues
1.> Compromises anonymity: Taking personal credit for public work.
2.> Beneficiaries dignity: no informed consent, seen as "meek and dependent".
3.> Undermines morale of officials: being subject to public humiliation.
4.> welfare awareness vs. personal branding.
5.> Income sources outside the service by monetized channels -> violation of Civil Services (Conduct) Rules.
6.> Diversion of focus from welfare orientation.
(b) In my opinion, measured use of social media through official channels has multiple benefits :- 1> Awareness generation. 2> Highlighting best practices -> demonstrative effect. 3> Nudging governmental dynamism. 4> Transparency and accountability -> showing translation of outlay to outcome. 5> virtual participation in governance.
However, the proliferation of personal youtube channels leads to:
1> Dilution of anonymity. 2> Misaligned incentives. 3> Cherry-picking evidence to suit narrative of good work.
Therefore, there is a need for balanced, department-first approach in social media.
(c) Principles for responsible digital engagement
1> Welfare first : project the scheme, not the officer.
2> Team Building : Highlight the role of various officials at all levels.
3> Informed consent : no filming without consent.
4> Unified narrative : through official channel only.
5> Transparency : show accomplishments as well as shortfalls.
6> Participation : For persuasive effect, videos should be by and for beneficiaries, explaining the scheme.
7.> Verification : only discuss verified facts and accomplishments.
Close
8> Dignity : no punishment on camera.
Hence, social media is a tool for participatory good governance following the Aristotlian golden mean of moderation.