GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words
Ms. Ananya Rao serves as a District Collector in Maharashtra. The district is embarking on an ambitious infrastructure project, the Rural Connectivity Project, designed to improve road connectivity between remote villages and main towns. This project promises significant benefits, including easier access to markets, healthcare, and education for the rural population. The project, however, is mired in controversy. Environmentalists argue that the construction will cause irreparable damage to local forests and wildlife habitats. Local farming communities are concerned about losing agricultural land due to road expansion. There are also allegations of inadequate compensation and resettlement plans for affected families. As the project progresses, various departments, including the Environment, Agriculture, and Public Works Department (PWD), are involved in the decision-making process. Each department has specific responsibilities. The Environment Department is tasked with assessing environmental impact, the Agriculture Department is responsible for ensuring farmers' rights, and the PWD is responsible for executing construction. Ms. Rao, in her capacity, oversees the coordination among these departments. However, the project faces delays and mounting public criticism due to conflicting priorities and lack of accountability. Environmental assessments are incomplete, farmers' concerns remain unaddressed, and construction deadlines are missed. In a critical meeting, the state Chief Secretary, Mr. Vikram Patel, emphasized the urgency of advancing the project and held Ms. Rao accountable for the delays, lack of progress, and overall non-performance. Ms. Rao left the meeting disappointed and felt holding her accountable for delay was unfair as there were others also involved in the project. (a) What are the ethical issues and dilemmas involved in the above case? (b) What are the options available to Ms. Rao? (c) What course of action would you suggest for Ms. Rao? Why? (d) Do you think holding Ms. Rao accountable for the delays was justified? Why/Why not?
Answered by 2 toppers · CSE 2024–2025
Ethical Dilemmas in GovernmentAccountability and Ethical GovernanceCivil Service ValuesEnvironmental Ethics
Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.
How toppers approached it
From all 2 answers · about 370 words.
Opening
- No separate opening2 of 2
Body
- Points and prose1 of 2
- Points1 of 2
Close
- A summary1 of 2
- A way forward1 of 2
The toppers’ answers
More on Ethical Dilemmas in Government
Ethical concerns and dilemmas arising in government and private institutions, and how a conflict between two duties is resolved.
- Ensuring that government decisions are not influenced by public officials' private interests is a growing concern. Discuss in the context of India. Also enumerate the core principles reflected by OECD guidelines for managing conflict of interest in the public sector.19 answers
- In a democracy, the purpose of the government should be to make it easy for people to do good and difficult to do wrong. Comment.18 answers
- What are the factors which drive people to take law in their own hands rather than following the due process of law? Discuss ways to address the problem of mob justice.18 answers
- A peculiar inhuman situation exists for the people fleeing from war zones - they cannot go back to their homeland for fear of being persecuted and no country is ready to bear their burden due to various reasons. Citing contemporary examples, discuss the ethical issues involved in such situations.17 answers
- It is argued by some that nuclear weapons have acted more as a deterrent than leading to war and mass destruction. In this context, discuss whether it is ethically right to possess nuclear weapons to create nuclear deterrence.16 answers