GS4 · 10 marks · 150 words

Many argue that there are times, when war is morally permissible, and even obligatory. Critically discuss.

Answered by 8 toppers · CSE 2018–2019

Syllabus: Contributions of moral thinkers and philosophers from India and world.

How toppers approached it

From all 8 answers · about 170 words.

Opening

  • No separate opening75%
  • A restatement25%

Body

  • Points50%
  • Points and prose38%
  • Continuous prose13%

Close

  • A summary38%
  • A way forward38%
  • No separate close25%

The toppers’ answers

Kanishak KatariaAIR 1 · CSE 2018 · 149 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening

War of being superior has given people shattered lives, yet the ethics of war

Throughout history war has given people pain & suffering, yet the arguments of war being morally permissible float around.

WHEN WAR IS UNETHICAL :

Body · points

  • Almost always. No human logic which believes in humanity can justify war.

Close · a summary

It brings mass destruction & promotes inequality & a race to be at the top as seen in the age of imperialism.

HOWEVER :

As seen in Mahabharata, sometimes for Truth to prevail over lie, war becomes a necessity. For protection of self-interest against unwarranted aggression from the other side, war becomes obligatory.

Example - When Pakistani soldiers tried to capture Kargil, India had to retaliate with military action.

Hence in situations where the national integrity & sovereignty is at stake & the action is taken in self-defence instead of self-aggression, war can be treated as morally permissible.

More on Ethics in International Relations

Ethical issues in international relations and in funding, aid and conditionality, and obligation beyond the border.

All GS4 questions on Ethics in International Relations