GS4 · 20 marks · 250 words
You are the Head of Human Resources in a prestigious IT company known for its high-profile clients and "innovative" work culture. The company takes pride in productivity, strict discipline, and fast-paced delivery cycles. However, over the past few months, there has been a surge in anonymous complaints about Verbal humiliation during team meetings, Unreasonable working hours, Hostile treatment of women employees, especially interns and fresh recruits. The center of many complaints is Mr. Rohan Mehta — a brilliant but autocratic team lead. He has a history of delivering projects ahead of schedule and is celebrated by top management as a "visionary performer." His team, however, is showing signs of burnout, absenteeism, and silent resignations. One day, a junior employee, Ms. Arpita Sharma, approaches you in confidence. She alleges that Rohan often yells at team members publicly, calls them "incompetent," A former intern had a mental breakdown and quit the industry entirely after being constantly micromanaged and belittled. Most employees are afraid to speak up because they fear being marked as "non-performers" or losing recommendation letters. She does not want to file a formal complaint but wants assurance that someone in the system still cares. Meanwhile, senior leadership is preparing for an upcoming merger, and you are told: “We cannot afford disruptions right now. Don't investigate our best performer. These are just exaggerated startup-style growing pains.” The CEO also feels that Rohan’s style may be harsh, but this is a high-pressure industry. If people can't handle it, they're not meant for leadership. You are at a moral crossroads. (a) Identify the ethical issues involved in this case. (b) What are the potential long-term consequences of this work culture? (c) As the HR Manager, how would you protect Arpita’s identity, ensure justice, and also balance company goals? (d) If you were the CEO, how would you address a culture that normalizes fear and overwork without directly confronting top performers?
Answered by 1 topper · CSE 2025
Syllabus: Case Studies on above issues.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 330 words.
Opening
- A quotation1 of 1
Body
- Points1 of 1
Close
- A source1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Corporate Governance
Ethics in the private sector: boards and disclosure, corporate social responsibility, regulatory capture, business and society.
- Which corporate leader has inspired you the most and what moral lessons have you learnt from their life?15 answers
- Discuss how effective corporate governance can ensure the equitable treatment of all stakeholders.13 answers
- You, a manager in one of the top IT firms in the country, are tasked with hiring new recruits for an upcoming project. You find that the company has given tacit instructions of not hiring female candidates in view of the new maternity law passed by the Government. You find this highly objectionable and lodge a protest with people in the higher management but they are firm as they want to cut down all the unnecessary costs. Based on this information, answer the following questions: (a) Identify the stakeholders and their interests in the situation. (b) What are the dilemmas that a recruiting manager may face in such a scenario? (c) What are the different options available to you? Which one will you pursue and why?10 answers
- Ultimately foreign policy of every country hinges upon the strength which the nation possesses. Strength may be military or financial and may be also...moral. Do you think ethical strength without military or financial muscle will be respected in today's world? Explain your position.10 answers
- Promoting National interest and gaining influence and power in the International arena are the two basic mantras of every country's external policy. Since the last decade, country ABC has aggressively pursued power and expanded its business interests overseas. One of the businesses ABC was interested in developing was Defence equipment and Satellite technology. It was seeking markets for its space and defense products. The country encouraged its defense equipment manufacturing companies to find new markets and explore manufacturing collaborations with other countries. GAMA, one of the major defense equipment manufacturers, had recently struck a massive multi-billion dollar deal involving sensitive technology transfer and equipment with a country XYZ ruled by Military Junta. It was good business. As the business details became public, much criticism came GAMA's way because XYZ was an international pariah because of its poor human rights record. Further, the Junta indulged in a silent genocide of a minority ethnic community. There was a lot of uproar because the deal involved transferring sensitive technology that could be misused in the wrong hands. In short, it was good business but with questionable clients. Meanwhile, the government of ABC kept silent about the GAMA business deal, and other governments interpreted the silence as a subtle way of building relations with a nation that was an international pariah. (a) What are the ethical issues involved in the above case?9 answers