GS3 · 10 marks · 150 words

Explain the structural and operational limitations of the Disaster Management Act, 2005. How far does the 2025 Amendment address these deficiencies through a shift towards anticipatory and technology-driven disaster governance?

Answered by 3 toppers · CSE 2024–2025

Syllabus: Disaster and disaster management.

How toppers approached it

From all 3 answers · about 150 words.

Opening

  • No separate opening2 of 3
  • A date or context1 of 3

Body

  • Points3 of 3

Close

  • A way forward2 of 3
  • No separate close1 of 3

The toppers’ answers

Sandeep BadadAIR 82 · CSE 2025 · 152 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening · a date or context

Disaster Management Act 2005 came in aftermath of Tsunami.

Body · points

Structural & operational limitation

  1. Planning at top level → rigidity (NDMA + CCS)

  2. Top down approach in guideline framing (NDMA guidelines) and implemention

  3. NDRF and funds given at discretion to states → not fair in some cases (eg Karnataka drought)

  4. Classification of disasters had lacunas (eg left heatwaves, drought is not under DM Act)

  5. Federal issues → due to overriding powers

eg Nation wide lockdown in Covid-19 unilaterally

2025 Amendment role in addressing deficiencies

  1. Planning is decentralized, given to DDMA, SDMA

  2. Bottom up approach: Suits local needs & anticipatory

  3. Disaster database → enable data driven decision

  4. Use of AI models, Big data, sat-com, Geospatial technology makes it pro-active.

  5. UDMA → Urban disaster management is addressed while earlier there was role confusion.

Close

It ushers in new promise particularly in rising vulnerability to climate change.

More on Disaster Management

Response to a specific hazard: flood, cyclone, earthquake, landslide, heatwave, drought, industrial and urban disaster.

All GS3 questions on Disaster Management