Ujjwal PriyankAIR 10 · CSE 2025 · 234 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) 2016 aimed at providing a streamlined approach to deal with non-performing assets in the economy.
Body · points
Key objectives.
- Ensuring effective management of NPA accounts for better regaining of capital.
- Differentiate between "wilful default" and NPA due to threats to the functioning of capital.
- Ensure "Asset Reconstruction Company" for letting the bank focus on its lending and administrative function. → Ensure a healthy balance sheet.
- Quicker and timely resolution of NPAs help in freeing capital for further investment.
- Earlier there were various schemes which led to ambiguity such as SARFAESI Act 2002. → IBC 2016 rationalised and simplified the procedure.
- Harnessing digital technology for the process of asset reconstruction.
Potential success of IBC 2016
- Reduction in Net NPA and Gross NPA in the economy. → Eg: Gross NPA was close to 2% in FY 2024-25.
- Effective management through National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd. (NARCL).
- Provided a simple mechanism, thus positive impact on bank's health.
- Ensure quick recovery of capital.
Yet there are limitations to IBC 2016.
- There are still delays in timely recovery of asset.
- No proper trained staff or separate cadre of officials for ARC.
- Lack infrastructure such as office, computer desks etc.
- Issues of collusive corruption and red-tapism.
Close · a way forward
Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code must be implemented in letters and spirit for healthy economy.