Pakshal SecretryAIR 8 · CSE 2025 · 276 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening · a constitutional or legal provision
Recently in State of TN vs Governor of TN case (2025), Supreme Court gave a time frame for Governor to act on pending bills under Art 201.
Body · points and prose
- Recurring Tension between State & Centre
- Pocket veto to bills
- e.g TN case
- Overstepping authority
- e.g WB governor Summon to DIG of state
- Acting as agent of Centre
- Criticising state policies
- e.g Punjab Governor
- Pocket veto to bills
Constitutional Powers
- Article 154 → Head of State
- Article 163 → Whether a power is discretionary is decided by governor himself
③ Article 200 : Can reserve bills for Presidential consideration ④ Article 356 → can recommend imposition of President Rule ⑤ Article 371 → special powers to governor of Maharashtra, Gujarat etc
Key concerns out of office
① Politicisation of the office → Acts as agent of centre in state
② Unnecessary delay in governance → Telangana → bills pending for more than year.
③ Misuse of discretionary power → Maharashtra → confidence motion governor → leading to fall of Government
④ Against federal principle → Restricts state autonomy.
⑤ Non-recognising of authority of state government.
⑥ Overstepping powers → modifying governor's address
Measures To Improve
(A) Sarkaria Commission (i) Governor to non-political person (ii) Fixed tenure of 5 years} (iii) Mandatory consultation with CM of state (iv) Provision for impeachment of Governor
(B) Case Laws (i) Nabam Rebia → Judicial Review of decision possible (ii) State of TN vs Governor : 3 month timeline to act for Governor (iii) SR Bommai case → Report should be speaking document in case of Article 356.
- Soli-S Sorabjee thus calls for "Minimalistic governor".
Close · no separate close
None written.