GS2
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) of India can be called the 'watchdog of human rights in the country'. Critically evaluate the role and effectiveness of the institution.
Answered by 1 topper
Syllabus: Statutory, regulatory and various quasi-judicial bodies.
How toppers approached it
From the one answer · about 260 words.
Opening
- A definition1 of 1
Body
- Points and prose1 of 1
Close
- A way forward1 of 1
The toppers’ answers
More on Statutory and Regulatory Bodies
Statutory, regulatory and quasi-judicial bodies and their independence.
- Discuss the recent changes and initiatives related to cooperatives that aim to smoothen the tussle between the Centre and States in the cooperative sector.11 answers
- "The NHRC must not only be a watchdog but also a beacon of hope for the marginalized and oppressed." In this context discuss the role and mandate of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in India. How does the current composition and functioning of the NHRC affect its independence and effectiveness?9 answers
- While the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) plays a crucial role in combating corruption, its functioning is often criticized for being partisan and acting against the federal spirit. Discuss with the help of suitable examples.6 answers
- How far do you agree with the view that the National Green Tribunal (NGT) has met its objective of ensuring environmental justice in India?6 answers
- Federal governance is characterised by institutionalized arrangements for solving problems generated by pluralism based on consultation and mutual consent. How have Zonal Councils evolved from merely advisory bodies to proactive platforms for action?6 answers