Ashi SharmaAIR 12 · CSE 2024 · 148 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
Recently the PM brought attention the freebie culture highlighting issues of dependencies created by welfare schemes. Welfare schemes & divergence of focus from hunger alleviation + poverty
Arguments in favour.
Body · points and prose
reduced funds for -> hunger | |-> poverty
Welfare schemes & divergence of focus from hunger alleviation + poverty
Arguments in favour.
(1) Increased expenditure on welfare schemes creates fiscal deficits (FD)
- 4.9% FD in FY24 (2) decreases availability of funds for other programmes
- around 4.5 L cr spent in food fuel fertilizer subsidy (FY24) (3) increased issue of hunger
- India -> #117 in Global hunger index
- 1/3rd kids -> malnourished
- 50% women and 14% men -> anaemic (NFHS-5) (4) increased issue of poverty
- NITI Aayog MDPI -> 16% population poor.
Arguments Against (1) welfare schemes address hunger
diagram [Steps] -> PM Poshan [Steps] -> Mid day meal scheme [Steps] -> ICDS [Steps] -> Weekly iron & folic acid supplementation scheme [Steps] -> anaemia mukt bharat [Steps] -> food fortification [Steps] -> promotion of millets [Steps] -> NFSA 2013
(2) empower citizens to reduce poverty
diagram [Steps] -> PM-Kaushal Vikas Yojana [Steps] -> NRLM [Steps] -> MGNREGA [Steps] -> PM MUDRA [Steps] -> PM-JDY [Steps] -> PM-JAY [Steps] -> Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan
Close · a framework
Welfare schemes should be properly implemented to reduce leakages and periodically monitored to ensure intended beneficiaries prosper so that we can achieve our SDG (1) (poverty) & SDG 2 (hunger).