Kumud MishraAIR 69 · CSE 2024 · 287 wordsTheir whole copy
Opening
There is a debate whether the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is a social issue or a security threat affecting the effectiveness of the government's policies.
Body · points
The government's strategy of reducing LWE in India:
- The government has adopted the idea of SAMADHAN to counter LWE:
- S - Strategic policy, smart leadership
- A - Aggressive response
- M - Motivation, training
- A - Action plan for each theatre
- D - Dashboard maintenance
- H - Harnessing technology
- A - Actionable intelligence
- N - NO to funds/finance.
- This policy has helped in reducing the impact and intensity of the LWE. Ex. There is 77% decline in LWE affected areas in past two decades (Ministry of Home Affairs).
(3) The highly LWE affected districts have come down to only 35 districts. Ex. operation Greenhunt role of COBRA and greyhounds.
(4) However, the effectiveness of the policy has been questioned with emerging challenges:
- Increase in concerted hybrid attacks. Ex. Bastar, Dantewada in Chhattisgarh.
- Rise of the intensity of LWE, making the goal of eradicating LWE by 2026 difficult.
- Emergence of urban naxalism creating security threats. Ex. in non-traditional areas like Maharashtra, Karnataka.
- The top-down policy approach further leading to tribal isolation. Ex. insider-outsider conflicts in tribal belts.
Further reforms needed:
- Bottom-up policy approach. Ex. NITI Aayog's Aspirational District Programme.
- Local policymaking and autonomy. Ex. implementation of PESA Act 1996.
- Innovative solutions to gain local confidence. Ex. educational relaxations for youth in CRPF by Chhattisgarh.
- Rationalizing surrender policy and SAMADHAN doctrine.
Close · a summary
Ex. Tribal Panchsheel.
Thus, to address both the social and security aspect there is the need for "welfare based approach" for "Development of all".
How toppers approach this question, and more on its topic: open the question.