UPSC Mains 2018 · GS III · Q10 · 10 marks · 150 words

Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is showing a downward trend, but still affects many parts of the country. Briefly explain the Government of India’s approach to counter the challenges posed by LWE.

हिन्दी में

वामपंथी उग्रवाद में अधोमुखी प्रवृत्ति दिखाई दे रही है, परंतु अभी भी देश के अनेक भाग इससे प्रभावित हैं। वामपंथी उग्रवाद द्वारा प्रस्तुत चुनौतियों का विरोध करने के लिए भारत सरकार के दृष्टिकोण को संक्षेप में स्पष्ट कीजिए।

How a topper answered the closest question

Toppers wrote this one in a test series: “Despite significant progress in combating Left Wing Extremism (LWE), challenges persist. Evaluate the effectiveness of the government's strategy in reducing Left Wing Extremism and its goal of eradicating LWE by 2026.”

Kumud MishraAIR 69 · CSE 2024 · 287 wordsTheir whole copy

Opening

There is a debate whether the Left Wing Extremism (LWE) is a social issue or a security threat affecting the effectiveness of the government's policies.

Body · points

The government's strategy of reducing LWE in India:

  1. The government has adopted the idea of SAMADHAN to counter LWE:
  • S - Strategic policy, smart leadership
  • A - Aggressive response
  • M - Motivation, training
  • A - Action plan for each theatre
  • D - Dashboard maintenance
  • H - Harnessing technology
  • A - Actionable intelligence
  • N - NO to funds/finance.
  1. This policy has helped in reducing the impact and intensity of the LWE. Ex. There is 77% decline in LWE affected areas in past two decades (Ministry of Home Affairs).

(3) The highly LWE affected districts have come down to only 35 districts. Ex. operation Greenhunt role of COBRA and greyhounds.

(4) However, the effectiveness of the policy has been questioned with emerging challenges:

  • Increase in concerted hybrid attacks. Ex. Bastar, Dantewada in Chhattisgarh.
  • Rise of the intensity of LWE, making the goal of eradicating LWE by 2026 difficult.
  • Emergence of urban naxalism creating security threats. Ex. in non-traditional areas like Maharashtra, Karnataka.
  • The top-down policy approach further leading to tribal isolation. Ex. insider-outsider conflicts in tribal belts.

Further reforms needed:

  1. Bottom-up policy approach. Ex. NITI Aayog's Aspirational District Programme.
  2. Local policymaking and autonomy. Ex. implementation of PESA Act 1996.
  3. Innovative solutions to gain local confidence. Ex. educational relaxations for youth in CRPF by Chhattisgarh.
  4. Rationalizing surrender policy and SAMADHAN doctrine.

Close · a summary

Ex. Tribal Panchsheel.

Thus, to address both the social and security aspect there is the need for "welfare based approach" for "Development of all".

How toppers approach this question, and more on its topic: open the question.

Toppers’ answers to other close questions

Source: UPSC, Civil Services (Main) Examination 2018, General Studies Paper III, Q10. The paper on upsc.gov.in. Themes and links to toppers’ answers are by UPSC Grade, not by UPSC.